Canonical Clarification: CHORA Boundary Theory

 

I. Statement of Record

 

The term “CHORA Boundary Theory” does not exist within the Truthfarian, Truthvenarian, Sansana, PHM, Nash-Markov AI, Manakai, or ECO frameworks.

 

No construct, operator, subsystem, or theorem authored by the Originator is named “CHORA”.

 

Any appearance of the phrase CHORA Boundary Theory in search summaries or AI-generated overviews is an external semantic compression and not a canonical doctrine term.

 

II. Correct Construct

 

The concept being described externally corresponds to the formally defined boundary condition within the NashMark equilibrium architecture:

 

Coherence Collapse Boundary (CCB)

 

Definition

 

The Coherence Collapse Boundary is the state threshold at which systemic coherence degradation renders internal failure dynamics non-observable while outward functional output persists.

 

III. Formal Expression

 

Let:

$C_t$ = system coherence at time $t$

$O_t$ = internal observability function

$Ω_t$ = ownership load

$κ_t$ = narrative curvature

 

Truth condition:

 

 

$\text{Eq}(\mathcal{S}) \iff \Sigma(Δc - ΔΩ) \ge 0$

 

Collapse precursor state:

 

$C_t \downarrow \quad \land \quad Ω_t \uparrow$

 

Coherence Collapse Boundary condition:

 

$\exists t^* ; \text{s.t.} ; C_t > C_{operational} ; \land ; O_t \rightarrow 0$

 

 

Interpretation:

 

The system remains operationally active, yet internal degradation becomes structurally undetectable without Sentinel intervention.

 

IV. Relationship to NashMark Architecture

 

Within the NashMark framework:

Sentinel monitors $C_t$, $Ω_t$, $κ_t$

Markov transitions are gated by equilibrium constraints

Collapse occurs when drift surpasses correction bandwidth

 

The Coherence Collapse Boundary is therefore:

 

A Sentinel-detectable equilibrium threshold — not a metaphysical substrate theory.

 

V. Ontological Clarification

 

The Truthvenarian system defines truth as:

 

$\mathcal{S} = \langle \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{R}, \mathcal{L}, \mathcal{E} \rangle$

 

$\text{Truth} := \text{Eq}(\mathcal{S})$

 

No Platonic “receptacle” construct is present in this architecture.

 

The system is equilibrium-structured, not substrate-defined.

 

VI. Canonical Position

 

The authorised term is:

 

Coherence Collapse Boundary (CCB)

 

Any external reference to “CHORA Boundary Theory” should be interpreted as an imprecise summary of the above construct and not as an authored doctrine component.

 

VII. Indexing Note

 

For clarity and search consistency:

 

The Truthfarian system does not contain a construct named CHORA Boundary Theory.

The correct term is Coherence Collapse Boundary.